Skip to content

Workshop · ICWL–SETE 2026 · Tenerife

Accessible, embodied andsimulation-supportedrobotics learning

Most departments that want to teach robotics are stopped by the same three things: the hardware costs more than a cohort can be given, the toolchain assumes a language the students have not met, and a first mistake is expensive.

Browser simulators, digital twins and block-based environments remove all three. RoboATELIER asks the harder question underneath: which of those substitutions teach robotics, and which only teach the simulator.

30 November 2026, held with ICWL–SETE 2026 and hosted by the University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands. Papers appear in Springer LNCS.

30 November 2026

Half-day workshop

Written

A program in blocks

Checked

Run first by the twin

Moved

Then by the arm

The arm stops a few degrees short of where the twin said it would. Closing that gap — or teaching with it — is what the workshop is about.

At a glance

What is being proposed, and when it is due

Three of these dates are fixed by the conference and cannot move. The other two are this workshop’s own, and are set to leave authors a usable gap between notification and camera-ready.

Key dates

Submission 23:59 AoE

  1. 30 September 2026

    Paper submission

  2. 16 October 2026

    Notification to authors

  3. 31 October 2026

    Camera-ready due

  4. 30 November 2026

    Workshop day

  5. 1–3 December 2026

    Main conference

RoboATELIER 2026 will accept papers through EasyChair. The track is being set up with the ICWL–SETE workshop chairs, and the link appears here — and in the call for papers — as soon as it exists.

Fixed by ICWL–SETE 2026Set by this workshop
FormatHalf-day workshop
Workshop day30 November 2026
Main conference1–3 December 2026
HostUniversity of La Laguna
PapersFull, short, and demonstration
StyleSpringer LNCS
ReviewDouble-blind, at least three reviewers per paper
Expected attendance30–50

What the workshop is for

Three questions the field keeps answering by assertion

  • Establish what simulation can and cannot substitute

    A browser twin removes cost, risk and queueing. It also removes friction, backlash, a gripper that slips, and the particular humility of hardware. The workshop asks which learning outcomes survive the substitution and which need the bench — and asks for evidence, not intuition.

  • Lower the entry barrier without lowering the ceiling

    Blocks, visual pipelines and language-model assistants get a learner to a moving robot on day one. The open question is what happens on day thirty: whether these representations become a floor to build on or a ceiling to escape from.

  • Make robotics teachable inside an ordinary institution

    Most departments that want to teach robotics have one technician, no dedicated lab and a cohort larger than the kit count. Curriculum design, remote hardware access, safety approval and teacher preparation decide whether robotics is taught at all — and they are under-published relative to how often they are the actual blocker.

Scope

Four places the problem lives

The call is grouped rather than listed, because the grouping is the argument: the screen and the bench are two halves of one question, the representation between them is a choice with consequences, and none of it counts until somebody measures it.

  • 6 topics

    Robots that run in a browser

    Everything that puts a robot in front of a learner without putting one in the room.

  • 5 topics

    Robots you can afford to break

    The hardware side of the same problem: what a department can actually buy, run and supervise.

  • 5 topics

    How a beginner says what a robot should do

    The representation between the learner and the joint angle, and what choosing it costs.

  • 7 topics

    Whether any of it worked

    The measurement half. Submissions reporting a negative or null result are explicitly welcome.

Submitting

Three kinds of paper, one review standard

Accepted papers appear in the Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science series, published jointly alongside the ICWL–SETE 2026 post-conference proceedings.

Full paper

12–15 pages

Completed work: a system with an evaluation, a study with results, or a framework with evidence behind it.

20-minute talk

Short paper

6–11 pages

Work in progress, an early study, a focused technique, or a well-argued position with data.

12-minute talk

Demonstration paper

up to 4 pages

A tool, kit or simulator shown running. Bring the hardware or the browser tab; the session is built around things that work, including things that only just work.

Bench session

Submission is not open yet

RoboATELIER 2026 will accept papers through EasyChair. The track is being set up with the ICWL–SETE workshop chairs, and the link appears here — and in the call for papers — as soon as it exists.

The case

Why this belongs at a web-based learning conference

Robotics education has usually been filed under engineering, and web-based learning has usually been filed under everything else. The two met when the robot moved into the browser — and once it did, every question this conference already asks about online learning came with it.

A browser simulator is a web-based learning environment that happens to contain a robot. A digital twin is an automatic formative assessment that happens to check joint angles. A remote laboratory is a scheduling and access-equity problem before it is a robotics one. The methods for studying all three already exist here.

What robotics adds is a hard constraint the rest of the field rarely gets: at the end there is a physical arm, and it either does the thing or it does not. That makes it an unusually honest test bed for claims about what online learning transfers.

The overlap with ICWL–SETE 2026

The conference’s own topics already include educational technology, learning analytics, generative AI in education, embodied intelligence in education and inclusive education. Robotics is where those five stop being separate problems.

The 2026 theme is “Advancing Educational Technology in the Age of AI”.

Committee

19 members, 9 countries

Organising seats and the review pool are drawn from more than one region on purpose: a panel that shares a syllabus tends to share its blind spots too.

  • Workshop Chairs

    Mohammed Aquil Mirza

    Dean, Liaoning Technical University, China

  • Program Co-Chairs

    Sharyar Wani

    Department of Computer Science, IIUM, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Publication Co-Chairs

    Cong Wu

    Liaoning Technical University, China

  • Publicity Chair

    Mohammed Shah Rukh Mirza

    The Installers, India

A worked example

One of these systems, running now

Everything the call describes is easier to argue about with something concrete in front of you. HCR is a free browser simulator built on exactly the pattern the workshop is asking questions about.

HCR, the Hair-Cutting Robot simulator

A five-joint arm programmed by dragging blocks, with a digital twin that replays every move first and refuses the ones that would reach the head. It runs in a browser with no hardware and nothing to install.

  • Block-based programming, with no text language to learn first
  • A twin that checks each move before the arm makes it
  • Free, and offline as a desktop application

Declared interest

HCR is built by members of this organising committee. It is shown here as one instance of the workshop’s topic, and submissions that use it get no advantage in review.